Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (9) TMI 72 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal grants deduction for lease payments & excludes debentures from disallowance. The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal regarding the eligibility to claim the principal portion of lease rental payments as a deduction. The Tribunal ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal grants deduction for lease payments & excludes debentures from disallowance.

                            The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal regarding the eligibility to claim the principal portion of lease rental payments as a deduction. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction of the principal portion of lease rental payments and reversed any depreciation claimed by the appellant on such assets. Additionally, the Tribunal partially allowed the appellant's appeal related to the disallowance under Section 14A, directing the AO to exclude the investment in debentures from the computation.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Eligibility to claim the principal portion of lease rental payments as a deduction.
                            2. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Eligibility to Claim Principal Portion of Lease Rental Payments

                            Background:
                            The appellant challenged the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] who confirmed the addition of the principal portion of lease rental payments amounting to Rs.15,98,265/-. The CIT(A) deemed the lease as a financial lease and considered the principal portion as capital in nature, thus disallowing it as a deduction.

                            Appellant's Argument:
                            The appellant argued that the lease agreement terms established the lessor as the absolute owner of the asset, and the appellant had no proprietary rights. They contended that the entire lease rental payments should be allowable as deductions. They also cited CBDT Circular No.2 of 2001, which clarifies that accounting standards should not impact the allowance of depreciation under the Income Tax Act.

                            Tribunal's Findings:
                            The Tribunal found that the issue was covered in favor of the appellant by previous decisions, specifically in the cases of M/s. Tristar Container Services (Asia) Private Ltd. and M/s Sundaram Infotech Solutions Ltd. The Tribunal noted that:

                            1. Nature of Lease: The assets under finance lease are capitalized in the balance sheet, and depreciation is claimed under the Companies Act. However, the Income Tax Act does not differentiate between finance and operating leases for tax purposes.

                            2. Depreciation and Ownership: Only the lessor is entitled to claim depreciation as per the Supreme Court decision in ICDS Limited Vs CIT. The lessee, in this case, the appellant, should be allowed to deduct the gross lease rental payments as revenue expenditure.

                            3. Consistency: The revenue had accepted this accounting/tax treatment in regular assessments from AYs 1998-99 to 2010-11, and thus, should maintain consistency.

                            4. Lease Agreement Terms: The lease agreement terms indicated that ownership remained with the lessor, and the lessee merely paid lease rentals, reinforcing that only the lessor could claim depreciation.

                            Conclusion: The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to allow the deduction of the principal portion of lease rental payments. Any depreciation claimed by the appellant on such assets was to be reversed.

                            Issue 2: Disallowance under Section 14A

                            Background:
                            For AY 2013-14, the appellant challenged the disallowance under Section 14A related to investments yielding exempt income. The AO computed a disallowance of Rs.5.18 Lacs, adding a differential of Rs.1.54 Lacs to the appellant's income.

                            Appellant's Argument:
                            The appellant requested that the investment in debentures amounting to Rs.60 Lacs be excluded while computing the disallowance, as these investments do not yield exempt income.

                            Tribunal's Findings:
                            The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, noting that investments in debentures do not yield exempt income. Therefore, the AO was directed to exclude the investment in debentures while computing the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii).

                            Conclusion: The Tribunal directed the AO to exclude the investment in debentures from the computation, thereby partially allowing the appeal.

                            Final Order:
                            Both appeals were partly allowed, with specific directions provided for the AO to follow in their recalculations and assessments. The order was pronounced on 03rd August 2022.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found