Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application seeking amendment of the earlier order and substitution of the interim resolution professional could be allowed, and whether a new interim resolution professional could be appointed in place of the earlier appointee.
Analysis: The application was moved under Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 in the context of the corporate insolvency resolution process. The earlier proposed professional had withdrawn consent and the previously appointed interim resolution professional was no longer available. The Tribunal also noted the need for the proposed professional to comply with the prescribed code of conduct before giving consent. Since the record showed no adverse material against the newly selected insolvency professional, the Tribunal proceeded to appoint him as interim resolution professional and issued consequential directions regarding filing of consent, public announcement, management of the corporate debtor, constitution of the committee of creditors, and reporting obligations.
Conclusion: The application for substitution of the interim resolution professional was allowed, and Mr. Anil Arora was appointed as the interim resolution professional in place of Mr. Manish Aggarwal.