Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (8) TMI 376 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal grants exemption under Section 54F, overturning AO's addition of Capital Gain. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, determining that the transfer of land occurred on 09.07.2010, with a sale consideration of Rs.5,36,000/- ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal grants exemption under Section 54F, overturning AO's addition of Capital Gain.

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, determining that the transfer of land occurred on 09.07.2010, with a sale consideration of Rs.5,36,000/- and justified exemption under Section 54F. The addition of Rs.1,96,18,540/- as Capital Gain by the AO was overturned.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Addition of Rs.1,96,18,540/- as Capital Gain on sale of land.
                            2. Determination of the date of transfer for capital gain calculation.
                            3. Rejection of the registered sale agreement dated 08.07.2010.
                            4. Valuation of the sale consideration.
                            5. Eligibility for exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act.

                            Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Addition of Rs.1,96,18,540/- as Capital Gain on Sale of Land:
                            The assessee contested the addition of Rs.1,96,18,540/- made by the AO under the head Capital Gain. The CIT(A) had confirmed this addition. The assessee argued that no capital gain arose during the year as the transfer took place on 8th July 2010 when the agreement to sale was executed and registered. The Tribunal found that the assessee transferred and handed over possession of the land on 09.07.2010, and the payment was made through a cheque, which was cleared on 12.07.2010. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the transfer had taken place within the meaning of Section 2(47) of the Act, and the addition made by the AO was not justified.

                            2. Determination of the Date of Transfer for Capital Gain Calculation:
                            The primary contention was whether the transfer occurred on the date of the agreement to sale (09.07.2010) or the date of the actual registration (24.03.2012). The Tribunal noted that the agreement to sale was registered, and the entire sale consideration was paid on 09.07.2010. The Tribunal referred to the amendment in Section 50C(1) by the Finance Act 2016, which is retrospective, stating that the value adopted by the stamp valuation authority on the date of the agreement should be considered for computing the full value of consideration. Thus, the Tribunal held that the date of agreement (09.07.2010) should be taken as the date of transfer.

                            3. Rejection of the Registered Sale Agreement Dated 08.07.2010:
                            The CIT(A) had rejected the registered sale agreement dated 08.07.2010. The Tribunal found that the agreement to sale was indeed registered, and the entire consideration was paid on the same date. The Tribunal emphasized that Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act applies as the sale agreement was registered, and the assessee received the entire sale consideration by cheque. Therefore, the rejection of the sale agreement by CIT(A) was not justified.

                            4. Valuation of the Sale Consideration:
                            The AO had taken the value of the sale at Rs.2,16,08,500/- as against Rs.1,79,01,000/- claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal referred to the amendment in Section 50C(1) and various judicial pronouncements, which state that if the date of the agreement and the date of registration are different, the value on the date of the agreement should be considered. The Tribunal concluded that the AO should have considered the guideline value of the land on the date of the agreement (09.07.2010), which was Rs.4,08,000/-. However, since the actual consideration received by the assessee was Rs.5,36,000/-, this amount should be used for capital gain calculation.

                            5. Eligibility for Exemption under Section 54F:
                            The assessee claimed exemption under Section 54F, stating that the sale proceeds were invested in a new residential house. The AO had allowed the exemption for Rs.16,05,000/- but disputed the amount of consideration under Section 50C(1). The Tribunal held that the consideration should be Rs.5,36,000/- as discussed, and since the exemption under Section 54F was already allowed by the AO, the assessee's claim was justified.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that the transfer took place on 09.07.2010, the sale consideration should be Rs.5,36,000/-, and the exemption under Section 54F was rightly claimed. The addition of Rs.1,96,18,540/- made by the AO was deleted.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found