Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Assessee's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Evidence; Orders Upheld</h1> <h3>Resurgere Mines & Minerals India Ltd. Versus ACIT, Range-15, New Delhi.</h3> Resurgere Mines & Minerals India Ltd. Versus ACIT, Range-15, New Delhi. - TMI Issues Involved:- Legality of the order passed by the learned CIT(A)- Adequacy of opportunity given to the assessee- Confirmation of various additions and disallowances made by the Assessing OfficerLegality of the Order and Opportunity Given:The appeal was directed against the order of the learned CIT(Appeals) pertaining to the assessment year 2011-12. The appellant raised grounds challenging the legality of the order, alleging a lack of proper opportunity to be heard, and errors in confirming the Assessing Officer's actions without findings on the merits. The Assessing Officer proceeded with assessment under Section 144 due to the auditors' refusal to sign the audit report and the assessee's failure to provide necessary details, resulting in the computation of income and additions.Confirmation of Additions and Disallowances:The Assessing Officer made various additions, including estimating income tax at 3% of total turnover, disallowing interest expenditure, outstanding liabilities, liabilities to overseas corporate bodies, credit balance, depreciation, and expenditure incurred. The Assessing Officer also invoked Section 14A for disallowances. The learned CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, upholding the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to comply with directions, did not furnish evidence to substantiate claims, and did not justify discrepancies in accounts, leading to the rejection of grounds challenging the additions and disallowances.Conclusion:The Tribunal upheld the orders of the authorities below, rejecting the grounds raised by the assessee. Despite opportunities given, the assessee failed to provide evidence to support its claims, leading to the confirmation of additions and disallowances. The general ground was not adjudicated, and the assessee's appeal was ultimately dismissed on 15th July 2022.