Captive-use wrapping paper and proforma credit under Rule 56A were denied where duty applied on clearance of packed goods.

Wrapping paper used internally within a factory to pack paper reels and reams before clearance was treated as part of the packed goods at the time of removal, so excise duty could be charged on the value of the packed paper including the wrapper. Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applies to duty-paid materials or component parts used in manufacture subject to prescribed conditions, but on the facts stated the manufacturer could not invoke it to exclude duty at the stage of captive use or to claim proforma credit for the wrapping paper. The claim for relief was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether wrapping paper used within the factory for packing other varieties of paper was liable to excise duty at the stage of captive use, and whether the manufacturer was entitled to proforma credit under Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: Rule 56A provides a special procedure for receipt and use of duty-paid materials or component parts in the manufacture of excisable goods and enables credit of duty already paid, subject to the prescribed conditions. On the facts found, the wrapping paper was not being removed from the factory as a separate commodity but was used internally for wrapping paper reels and reams before clearance. The Court found no illegality in the excise authorities' view that duty was chargeable on the value of the packed paper at the stage of clearance, including the value of the wrapper, and that the petitioner could not claim the relief sought on the basis of the rule as invoked.

Conclusion: The claim to avoid duty at the stage of captive use and to obtain proforma credit under Rule 56A was rejected.

---