Tax Department Cannot Issue Fresh Section 73 Notice After Section 74 Adjudication Found No Demand Due

The HC stayed a demand notice of Rs.2,11,59,881 issued under Section 73 of the CGST Act. The petitioner argued that the same matter had been previously adjudicated under Section 74, resulting in no demand being raised, and the respondent had not appealed this outcome. The court granted interim stay until the next hearing, accepting the petitioner's contention that issuing a fresh notice under Section 73 for the same cause of action was impermissible after adjudication under Section 74 had already occurred.

---

---

Issues:
1. Challenge to a demand notice issued under the CGST Act, 2017.
2. Interpretation of Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding issuance of show cause notices.
3. Stay application against the demand notice.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Challenge to Demand Notice
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a Demand Notice issued by the Respondent, requiring the petitioner to deposit tax, interest, and penalty totaling to Rs.2,11,59,881. The petitioner contended that a previous notice under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 had been issued and adjudicated upon, resulting in no demand being raised in the Refund Sanction/Rejection Order. The petitioner argued that issuing a new demand notice under Section 73 for the same cause of action was impermissible.

Issue 2: Interpretation of Sections 73 and 74
The petitioner argued that under the CGST Act, 2017, a show cause notice for a specific cause of action can be issued under either Section 73 or Section 74. Once a show cause notice is issued and adjudicated under Section 74, the petitioner contended that no notice can be issued for the same cause of action under Section 73. The petitioner highlighted that a notice under Section 74 had been issued previously, adjudicated upon, and partly decided in favor of the petitioner, with no appeal filed by the Respondent. Therefore, the petitioner asserted that it was not permissible to issue a fresh demand notice under Section 73 for the same cause of action.

Issue 3: Stay Application
The Court issued notice to the Respondent and stayed the impugned Demand Notice dated 02.06.2022 until the next date of hearing. The stay was granted to prevent any immediate enforcement or action on the demand notice, allowing the petitioner time to present their case before the Roster Bench on 05.08.2022.

This judgment addresses the procedural aspects of issuing demand notices under the CGST Act, 2017, emphasizing the importance of adherence to the provisions of Sections 73 and 74 and ensuring that no duplication of proceedings occurs for the same cause of action. The stay granted provides temporary relief to the petitioner pending further judicial review and highlights the Court's role in safeguarding the rights of parties involved in tax disputes.

---