Tribunal dismisses Revenue's appeal, upholds assessee's objection

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the Cross Objection raised by the assessee, concluding that there was no infirmity in the Ld. CIT(A)'s order. The Tribunal found no material evidence for unaccounted purchases to effect the sales and held that separate addition of unaccounted sales was not required. The Tribunal also ruled that double taxation on unaccounted sales and gross profit was not justified. The judgment was pronounced on 15th June 2022.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition of Rs. 3,00,00,000 towards unaccounted sales.
2. Admission of additional ground by the Ld. CIT(A).
3. Double taxation of Rs. 3,10,00,000.
4. Double taxation of Rs. 37,50,000 as gross profit on unaccounted sales.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Addition of Rs. 3,00,00,000 towards unaccounted sales:
The assessee voluntarily admitted Rs. 3,00,00,000 towards unaccounted sales but omitted Rs. 3,10,69,693 being the sale of 8786.872 grams of gold during 6/11/2016 to 8/11/2016. The assessee argued that this sale was already included in the books, and adding Rs. 3,00,00,000 again amounts to double taxation. The Tribunal noted that there was no material evidence for unaccounted purchases to effect these sales. The deficit stock found during the survey included the unaccounted sales. The Tribunal concluded that the separate addition of unaccounted sales was not required as the purchases were already recorded in the books, and the sale of 8786.872 grams was the only unaccounted item. The Tribunal found no cogent material or evidence brought by the AO to support the additions and upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s order.

2. Admission of additional ground by the Ld. CIT(A):
The assessee could not file a revised return due to the time-barred date under section 139(5) and thus raised an additional ground before the Ld. CIT(A). The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument, noting that the Ld. CIT(A) rightly allowed the additional ground considering the merits. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's contention against the admission of the additional ground.

3. Double taxation of Rs. 3,10,00,000:
The Revenue argued that the assessee made separate purchases for unaccounted sales, while the assessee contended that taxing Rs. 3,10,69,693 as unaccounted sales and again based on survey admission was double taxation. The Tribunal disagreed with the Revenue's contention, noting that if unaccounted purchases were included, the deficit stock would have been higher than 696.787 grams. The Tribunal concluded that the grounds raised by the Revenue were not sustainable and upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s order.

4. Double taxation of Rs. 37,50,000 as gross profit on unaccounted sales:
The assessee argued that since Rs. 3,10,69,693 was already admitted as unaccounted sales, further adding Rs. 37,50,000 as gross profit on the same sales amounted to double taxation. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument, noting that taxing the gross profit of already accounted unaccounted sales was double taxation. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's ground.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the Cross Objection raised by the assessee, concluding that there was no infirmity in the Ld. CIT(A)'s order, and no further interference was required. The judgment was pronounced on 15th June 2022.

---