Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the struck-off company was entitled to restoration of its name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Analysis: The company produced financial statements, balance sheets, bank statements and tax-related documents to show that it had assets and carried on business operations. The material on record indicated that the company was in existence and functioning as a going concern, and the respondent's final report acknowledged the subsequent filings and the generation of revenue from operations. On that basis, the statutory requirement for restoration was satisfied.
Conclusion: Restoration of the company's name in the Register of Companies was justified and directed.
Ratio Decidendi: A struck-off company may be restored when the record shows that it remained in existence as a going concern and the statutory materials support revival under the restoration provision.