Real estate developer must pass 4.81% ITC benefit to 390 flat buyers after Section 171 CGST violation

NAPA found that respondent real estate developer contravened Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 by failing to pass on additional ITC benefit of 4.81% to 390 flat buyers including applicant. Developer profiteered Rs. 4,74,54,151 during July 2017 to June 2019. Authority ordered respondent to reduce flat prices commensurate with ITC benefit received and pass on future ITC benefits to buyers. No penalty imposed as Section 171(3A) penalty provision was inserted effective January 2020, after the violation period. Application disposed of within prescribed limitation period.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Allegation of profiteering by not passing on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under GST.
2. Compliance with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.
3. Investigation and findings by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP).
4. Respondent's defense and submissions.
5. Calculation of profiteered amount and benefit passed on.
6. Imposition of penalty and compliance directives.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Allegation of Profiteering:
The case began with a complaint from Applicant No. 1, alleging that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of ITC by reducing the price of a flat purchased in the project "Heritage Max." The complaint was scrutinized by the Haryana State Screening Committee and forwarded to the DGAP for detailed investigation.

2. Compliance with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017:
The primary issue was whether the Respondent reduced the rate of tax or passed on the benefit of ITC on construction services after GST implementation from 01.07.2017, as mandated by Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.

3. Investigation and Findings by DGAP:
The DGAP conducted an investigation covering the period from 01.07.2017 to 30.06.2019. The Respondent was asked to provide documents and evidence, which included GSTR-1, GSTR-3B returns, Tran-1 forms, and other relevant financial documents. The DGAP found that the Respondent had benefited from additional ITC post-GST, which was not passed on to the buyers.

4. Respondent's Defense and Submissions:
The Respondent argued that:
- Most of the expenditure was incurred in the pre-GST regime.
- The ITC availed was insufficient to offset the increased costs due to GST.
- The benefit of ITC was already considered in the pre-GST pricing.
- The Respondent had passed on a substantial amount of ITC benefit to the customers.

Despite these claims, the DGAP found discrepancies and concluded that the Respondent did not pass on the full benefit of the additional ITC.

5. Calculation of Profiteered Amount and Benefit Passed On:
The DGAP calculated the profiteered amount as Rs. 4,74,54,151/-, including 12% GST on the base profiteered amount of Rs. 4,23,69,778/-. The benefit to be passed on to Applicant No. 1 was Rs. 1,23,225/-. The DGAP verified that the Respondent had passed on Rs. 3,70,88,000/- to 245 home buyers but found that an additional Rs. 1,03,66,151/- was still due to be passed on.

6. Imposition of Penalty and Compliance Directives:
The Authority found that the Respondent had contravened Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, by not passing on the benefit of ITC. However, since the penalty provisions under Section 171(3A) were effective only from 01.01.2020, no penalty was imposed for the period under investigation (01.07.2017 to 30.06.2019).

Compliance Directives:
- The Respondent was ordered to pass on the remaining benefit of Rs. 1,03,66,151/- to the eligible recipients within three months, along with interest @18% from the date of profiteering until payment.
- The jurisdictional CGST/SGST Commissioner was directed to ensure compliance and submit a report within four months.
- An advertisement was to be published to inform the homebuyers about the order and their entitlements.

Conclusion:
The Authority concluded that the Respondent had profiteered by not passing on the benefit of ITC to the homebuyers in the project "Heritage Max." The Respondent was directed to refund the profiteered amount to the affected buyers, ensuring compliance with the CGST Act, 2017.

---