Tribunal orders reassessment of Section 80G(5) registration denial, stresses fair hearing & reasoned decision.

The Tribunal directed the CIT(E) to reconsider the rejection of the assessee's application for registration under Section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the need for proper opportunity of being heard and a reasoned decision. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Rejection of application for registration/approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Adequate opportunity of being heard.
3. Assessment of charitable nature of activities.
4. Verification of financial records and expenses.
5. Compliance with Section 13(1)(c) read with Section 13(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Rejection of application for registration/approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
The assessee's application for registration/approval under Section 80G(5) was rejected by the CIT(E) on the grounds that the assessee was not solely existing for educational purposes. The CIT(E) observed that the assessee was primarily running an educational institution on commercial lines without any element of charity to the public at large. The CIT(E) noted significant tuition fees and other charges, indicating commercial activity rather than charitable purposes.

2. Adequate opportunity of being heard:
The assessee argued that proper and adequate opportunity of being heard was not granted by the CIT(E). The CIT(E) had issued a notice with 23 queries and fixed hearing dates, but the assessee sought adjournments and partially responded. On the final hearing date, the assessee did not appear, and the CIT(E) rejected the application without granting further opportunity. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(E) hastened to dismiss the application without giving one more opportunity for the assessee to present its case.

3. Assessment of charitable nature of activities:
The CIT(E) concluded that the assessee was not engaged in charitable activities, based on the observation that the assessee charged high fees and did not invest funds towards charitable objects. The CIT(E) also noted that the expenses claimed by the assessee were exaggerated and mostly bogus, and the assessee was earning significant profits, indicating commercial rather than charitable activities.

4. Verification of financial records and expenses:
The CIT(E) found that the assessee did not produce books of accounts and vouchers for verification. The CIT(E) observed that the assessee failed to provide details of salary expenses and spent large amounts on advertisement and repairs, which were seen as business expenses rather than charitable activities. The Tribunal noted that the assessee claimed its books of accounts and vouchers were available for verification if given another opportunity.

5. Compliance with Section 13(1)(c) read with Section 13(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
The CIT(E) observed that the lease agreements between the assessee and society members granted benefits to the society members, infringing upon Section 13(1)(c) read with Section 13(3). The Tribunal noted that the assessee argued that rent paid was low compared to market rates and did not confer undue benefit to society members.

Tribunal's Decision:
The Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the CIT(E) for de novo consideration, directing the CIT(E) to provide proper and adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the CIT(E) to pass a reasoned and speaking order, considering the evidence and explanations provided by the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

Order Pronouncement:
The order was pronounced on 22/04/2022 at Varanasi, U.P.

---