Supreme Court Quashes Orders, Restores Case for Fresh Decision The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the orders of the High Court and Trial Court. The exparte judgment and decree were set aside, and the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court Quashes Orders, Restores Case for Fresh Decision
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the orders of the High Court and Trial Court. The exparte judgment and decree were set aside, and the original suit was ordered to be restored before the Trial Court for a fresh decision on its merits. The appellants were directed to appear before the Trial Court and file their written statements. The amount deposited by the appellants was to be kept in an interest-bearing fixed deposit by the Bank, to be appropriated based on the suit's outcome. The appeal was allowed without costs.
Issues: Challenge of order dismissing the petition to set aside exparte decree.
Analysis: The appellants, original defendants, challenged the order passed by the Trial Court dismissing the petition to set aside the exparte decree. The High Court dismissed the revision application, leading to the present appeal before the Supreme Court. The appellant no.1, a company, had availed a loan from the respondent bank, with appellant nos. 2 and 3 being directors residing in the USA. The suit for recovery of the loan amount proceeded exparte as the appellants were not present to receive summons and notices, which were returned 'unclaimed'. The exparte decree was passed in 2004, and the appellants became aware of it in 2014. They filed an application to set aside the exparte judgment, which was dismissed by the Trial Court and later by the High Court.
At the time of hearing the appeal, it was noted that the appellants had deposited 50% of the decretal amount as per the High Court's order. The Supreme Court directed the deposit of the remaining 50%, which was subsequently done. Considering the circumstances, the Supreme Court observed that giving the appellants another chance to defend the suit would meet the ends of justice, especially since the entire decretal amount had been deposited to secure the alleged dues to the Bank.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the orders of the High Court and Trial Court. The exparte judgment and decree were set aside, and the original suit was ordered to be restored before the Trial Court for a fresh decision on its merits. The appellants were directed to appear before the Trial Court and file their written statements. The amount deposited by the appellants was to be kept in an interest-bearing fixed deposit by the Bank, to be appropriated based on the suit's outcome. The appeal was allowed without costs.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.