Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the admission of the section 9 application was justified on the ground that the operational creditor had proved an operational debt due from the corporate debtor and that no genuine pre-existing dispute existed.
Analysis: The invoices and payment trail showed that the tax invoice was raised in favour of the corporate debtor, the part payments were made by it, and TDS as well as GST were reflected against the transaction. On the record, the relationship of supplier and recipient was between the operational creditor and the corporate debtor, which established privity of contract and a legally enforceable liability. The material placed by the corporate debtor did not disclose any real dispute capable of defeating the insolvency claim; the alleged dispute was not shown to be bona fide or substantiated.
Conclusion: The operational creditor was rightly treated as such, the debt was held to be operational debt due and payable, and the section 9 application was correctly admitted. The appeal was therefore dismissed.