Tribunal Holds Corporate Debtor Liable for Unpaid Dues, Initiates Insolvency Resolution Process

The Tribunal found in favor of the Operational Creditors, holding the Corporate Debtor liable for unpaid dues of Rs. 1,34,08,000. The Tribunal concluded that the Corporate Debtor was not merely an agent but a principal in the transaction, and therefore, liable to pay the outstanding amount to the Operational Creditors. Consequently, the Tribunal admitted the petition, initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, and appointed an Insolvency Resolution Professional for the Corporate Debtor.

---

---

Issues:
Operational Creditor's petition under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 for CIRP initiation against Corporate Debtor.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Operational Creditor's Claims:
- The Operational Creditors provided services to the Corporate Debtor and claimed unpaid dues of Rs. 1,34,08,000.
- The Corporate Debtor partly paid the amount but disputed the relationship and liability.
- The Operational Creditors argued that Corporate Debtor had a direct contractual relationship with them, regardless of involvement of C & K.

2. Corporate Debtor's Defense:
- Corporate Debtor contended that the payment was made on instructions of C & K, acting as an intermediary for payment disbursement.
- Corporate Debtor disputed the debt, claiming no services were rendered directly to them.
- Corporate Debtor objected to the claim raised against a third party and denied privity of contract with Operational Creditors.

3. Judgment and Decision:
- After reviewing the transactions and invoices, the Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor was not merely an agent but a principal in the transaction.
- The Tribunal concluded that the Corporate Debtor was liable to pay the outstanding amount to the Operational Creditors, which it failed to do.
- The Tribunal admitted the petition, initiated the CIR Process, and appointed an Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) for the Corporate Debtor.

4. Additional Directions:
- The Operational Creditor was directed to deposit a sum with the IRP to cover expenses related to the CIRP process.
- Moratorium was imposed on the Corporate Debtor as per Section 14(1) of the IBC, 2016, prohibiting certain actions during the moratorium period.
- Various administrative directions were given, including communication of the order to relevant parties and authorities for compliance.

In conclusion, the Tribunal found in favor of the Operational Creditors, holding the Corporate Debtor liable for the unpaid dues and initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The judgment provided detailed reasoning based on the contractual relationships and payment transactions between the parties, ensuring compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

---