Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was maintainable when instituted before expiry of the 15-day period after service of notice under the proviso.
Analysis: The 15-day period under clause (c) of the proviso to Section 138 is a statutory window intended to give the drawer an opportunity to discharge the legally enforceable debt and thereby avoid prosecution. The cause of action for launching proceedings arises only after expiry of that period. Where the complaint is filed before completion of the statutory period, the legislative opportunity is curtailed and the prosecution is premature. The cited authorities did not assist the appellant on the facts, as the present case concerned institution of proceedings on the 12th day after service of notice.
Conclusion: The complaint was premature and no cause of action had accrued on the date of filing; the challenge to the dismissal therefore failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot be initiated before expiry of the statutory 15-day period after service of notice, as the cause of action arises only on non-payment after that period.