ITAT allows appeal to delete disallowed ESOP expenses, dismisses Section 14A ground

The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowed ESOP expenses amounting to Rs. 4,99,46,617. The ground related to the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of Employees Stock Option Expenses (ESOP) amounting to Rs. 4,99,46,617/-.
2. Disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs. 14,823/- under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Employees Stock Option Expenses (ESOP) amounting to Rs. 4,99,46,617/-:

The assessee filed a return of income declaring Rs. 48,25,80,200/-, which was assessed at Rs. 53,27,90,720/- after disallowing ESOP expenses of Rs. 4,99,46,617/-. The ESOP expenses represented the difference between the Fair Market Value of stock options granted to employees and the amount paid by employees upon exercising the options. The assessee claimed this as a business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.

The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, considering it a notional loss and capital expenditure. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, stating that ESOP expenses did not represent actual expenditure and were not allowable under Section 37(1).

The assessee appealed to the ITAT, citing various precedents, including the Special Bench decision in Biocon Ltd. 35 taxmann.com 335, which was upheld by the Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. Biocon Ltd. 121 taxmann.com 351. The assessee also referenced decisions from the Delhi High Court in Pr. CIT vs. New Delhi Television Ltd. 398 ITR 57 and CIT vs. Lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. ITA No.107/2015.

The ITAT noted that the issue was already decided in favor of the assessee in ACIT vs. People Strong HR Services (P.) Ltd. 134 taxmann.com 351, where it was held that ESOP discounts represent consideration for services rendered by employees and are deductible business expenses. The ITAT found no distinguishing facts in the present case and followed the precedents, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 4,99,46,617/-.

2. Disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs. 14,823/- under Section 14A read with Rule 8D:

The Assessing Officer also made an addition of Rs. 2,63,907/- under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, representing expenditure incurred to earn exempt income by way of dividends. The CIT(A) confirmed Rs. 14,823/- of this amount and directed verification of the remaining Rs. 2,49,084/-.

During the ITAT proceedings, the assessee's counsel submitted that the assessee was not pressing this ground and withdrew the appeal regarding this issue. Consequently, the ITAT dismissed this ground as not pressed and withdrawn by the assessee.

Conclusion:

The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the ESOP expenses disallowance of Rs. 4,99,46,617/- and dismissing the ground related to disallowance under Section 14A as withdrawn by the assessee.

---