Database access payments not royalty where no copyright rights are transferred; tax addition deleted on treaty and Supreme Court principles.

Limited online access to a database containing public-domain information with value additions was held not to constitute royalty under Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA, because the user acquired access to a product and not any right to reproduce, adapt, or otherwise exploit the underlying copyright. Applying the Supreme Court principle on software and copyright payments, the consideration was treated as payment for a copyrighted article rather than use of copyright, so no royalty character and no withholding basis arose. The assessment addition based on royalty treatment was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the revenue derived from granting limited online access to the database was royalty under Article 12 of the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. (ii) Whether the impugned addition could survive in view of the Supreme Court ruling on software and copyright payments.

Issue (i): Whether the revenue derived from granting limited online access to the database was royalty under Article 12 of the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.

Analysis: The treaty definition of royalty applies only where the payment is for the use of, or the right to use, copyright in a literary, artistic, or scientific work. The assessee only enabled access to a database consisting of public-domain information with value additions such as indexing and analysis. The user received access to the product and did not obtain any right to reproduce, adapt, or otherwise exploit the underlying copyright. A distinction was therefore drawn between use of a copyrighted article and use of copyright itself.

Conclusion: The receipts from providing database access were not royalty under Article 12 of the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement and the finding was in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the impugned addition could survive in view of the Supreme Court ruling on software and copyright payments.

Analysis: The Supreme Court ruling was applied to hold that where no interest or right in copyright is transferred, the consideration does not constitute royalty and no withholding obligation arises on that basis. In light of that binding principle, the addition sustained by the lower authority could not stand.

Conclusion: The impugned addition was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The taxability of the database-access receipts as royalty was rejected, and the assessment addition based on that characterisation did not survive.

Ratio Decidendi: Consideration for mere access to a copyrighted product, without transfer of any right to use or exploit the underlying copyright, is not royalty under the treaty or the domestic royalty provision.

---