Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether subscription fee received for granting access to an online database of journals and books constitutes royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA.
Analysis: The database contents were collated from the public domain and the assessee merely created a user-friendly database with limited value additions such as indexing, analysis and notes. Customers were only given access to view the database and were expressly barred from copying, reproducing, modifying, reverse engineering or exploiting the contents. No right in the copyright or any industrial, commercial or scientific equipment was transferred to the subscribers. The payment was therefore for limited access to information, not for use of, or right to use, copyright or any other property falling within the treaty definition of royalty. The earlier view favouring taxation as royalty stood displaced by the ratio of Engineering Analysis.
Conclusion: The receipt was not royalty and was not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment.