Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned certificate and the order under Section 197 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained when they disregarded a binding Supreme Court decision on taxability of subscription receipts on the ground that a review petition was pending.
Analysis: The order under challenge contained no independent reasoning and proceeded by relying on an assessment order that treated the receipts as royalty under Article 12 of the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The binding effect of the Supreme Court decision in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. was emphasised. It was also noted that the review petition against that decision had already been dismissed, and that a pending review could not justify ignoring a binding precedent. Under Article 141 of the Constitution of India, the decision of the Supreme Court continued to bind the Revenue.
Conclusion: The impugned order could not stand and was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The matter was sent back for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer in accordance with law, and the petitioner obtained the substantive relief of reconsideration of its withholding-tax application.
Ratio Decidendi: A binding decision of the Supreme Court must be followed by revenue authorities and cannot be disregarded merely because a review petition is pending or has been filed.