Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether assessment orders passed under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were liable to be interfered with in writ jurisdiction on the ground of alleged non-consideration of the reply and alleged violation of natural justice.
Analysis: The assessment orders showed that the petitioner's detailed reply dated 22.11.2021 had been referred to and considered item-wise, including the principal objection regarding stock transfer. On that basis, the case was not one of complete absence of hearing or total non-consideration of the defence. Any grievance that the consideration was insufficient, inadequate, or not persuasive on the facts was held to be a matter for the appellate authority, not for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court also noted the availability of an appellate remedy and accepted that the appellate authority could be directed not to impose further conditions beyond the statutory pre-deposit of 25% and to dispose of the appeal expeditiously.
Conclusion: The writ petitions were not maintainable for interference on the facts pleaded, and the assessment orders were not set aside. The petitioner was relegated to the statutory appeal remedy with the directions indicated.