https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418966 Assessment orders under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act were not interfered with in writ jurisdiction because the assessee's detailed reply had been referred to and considered item-wise, including the stock-transfer objection. The grievance was therefore treated as one of alleged inadequacy of consideration, not complete denial of hearing or total non-consideration of the defence, and that issue was held fit for statutory appeal rather than Article 226 review. The assessment orders were left undisturbed, and the assessee was relegated to the appeal remedy with directions that no condition be imposed beyond the statutory 25% pre-deposit and that the appeal be disposed of expeditiously. en-us Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Mar 2022 08:17:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418966 Assessment orders under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act were not interfered with in writ jurisdiction because the assessee's detailed reply had been referred to and considered item-wise, including the stock-transfer objection. The grievance was therefore treated as one of alleged inadequacy of consideration, not complete denial of hearing or total non-consideration of the defence, and that issue was held fit for statutory appeal rather than Article 226 review. The assessment orders were left undisturbed, and the assessee was relegated to the appeal remedy with directions that no condition be imposed beyond the statutory 25% pre-deposit and that the appeal be disposed of expeditiously. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418966