TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court sets aside assessment order due to technical glitches, grants petitioner another chance for review</h1> <h3>ARPITHA AGENCIES Versus ASSESSING OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTRE, JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER, PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6</h3> ARPITHA AGENCIES Versus ASSESSING OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTRE, JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER, PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF ... Issues:Petition seeking quashing of assessment order due to technical glitches in uploading information/documents.Analysis:The petitioner sought the quashing of an assessment order dated 24.09.2021 passed by respondent No.1, citing technical issues in uploading information onto the department's portal. The petitioner highlighted that due to glitches and constraints, certain information was not uploaded, leading to the passing of the impugned order. The petitioner requested another opportunity to provide the necessary documents either through online upload or physical copies. The respondents argued that since the relevant information was not uploaded before the order, there was no option but to pass it. Despite the contentions from both sides, the Court observed that the petitioner's inability to furnish the documents prior to the order was due to technical issues. Consequently, the Court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration, allowing the petitioner to provide the required information either online or in physical form.The Court acknowledged the specific assertion by the petitioner regarding the technical glitches preventing the uploading of documents. In the interest of justice, the Court deemed it appropriate to grant the petitioner another opportunity to furnish the necessary information/documents. The Court directed respondent No.1 to reconsider the matter afresh after the petitioner provides the relevant documents either by uploading them online or submitting physical copies. The order allowed for a hearing for the petitioner and instructed respondent No.1 to conclude the proceedings in accordance with the law. It was also noted that all rival contentions were kept open, and no opinion was expressed on them, ensuring fairness and impartiality in the process.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
