Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order directing the convicted accused to deposit 20% of the compensation under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, was illegal or unwarranted.
Analysis: The order was examined in the light of Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as amended, and the Supreme Court's interpretation that the provision applies to appeals against conviction under Section 138 even where the complaint was filed before the amendment. The amended provision was construed purposively so that the appellate court may direct deposit of a sum not less than 20% of the fine or compensation, and such direction is ordinarily to be treated as the rule, with departure only for special reasons.
Conclusion: The impugned direction to deposit 20% of the compensation was held to be valid, and the challenge under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as amended, applies to pending appeals against conviction under Section 138 and authorises the appellate court to direct a minimum deposit of 20% of the fine or compensation pending appeal.