Bail in documentary investigation: prior interrogation, seized records and no need for further custodial questioning justified release.

In a prosecution alleging conspiracy, cheating, forgery, criminal breach of trust and corruption arising from the APSSDC project, the HC granted bail because the investigation was substantially documentary, the petitioners had already been interrogated, and relevant devices and records had been seized. The Court noted that police custody had earlier been declined for want of necessity, the investigation was still continuing, and the prosecution case depended mainly on records and reports rather than further custodial interrogation. Applying the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception, and taking account of the petitioners' undertaking to cooperate, continued judicial custody was held unjustified and bail was ordered.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to regular bail in a case alleging conspiracy, cheating, forgery, criminal breach of trust and corruption in relation to the APSSDC project, and whether continued judicial custody was warranted when the investigation was substantially documentary and police custody had already been declined.

Analysis: The allegations arose from an alleged diversion of public funds through shell entities and fake invoices, but the material before the Court showed that the petitioners had already been interrogated, searches had been conducted, and relevant devices and documents had been seized. The request for police custody had earlier been rejected by the Special Court, which had found no necessity for further custodial interrogation. The Court also noted that the investigation was continuing and that the prosecution case rested primarily on records and reports, while the petitioners undertook to cooperate. In these circumstances, the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception was applied.

Conclusion: The petitioners were held entitled to bail.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the investigation is substantially documentary, the accused has already been interrogated and relevant material has been seized, continued custody is not justified merely on the basis of serious allegations, and bail may be granted with suitable conditions.

---