Steel furniture classification under excise law: operation and orthopaedic tables excluded, but x-ray protective screens included.

Classification under Item No. 40 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 turned on whether the goods could properly be treated as steel furniture. Operation tables were not furniture in ordinary or commercial understanding and were therefore outside the entry, so excise duty was not payable on them. Orthopaedic and fracture tables were treated on the same footing and also fell outside Item No. 40, with no duty attracted. X-ray protective screens, however, were held to fall within the tariff entry as steel furniture, so the levy on those goods was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether operation tables and orthopaedic and fracture tables manufactured by the assessee, and x-ray protective screens, fell within Item No. 40 in the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 as steel furniture, so as to attract excise duty.

Analysis: The Court accepted the High Court's reasoning that operation tables were not furniture and therefore could not be treated as steel furniture under Item No. 40. On the same statutory classification, the Court upheld the view that x-ray protective screens were covered by the tariff entry as steel furniture. In the connected appeal concerning orthopaedic and fracture tables, the same classification principle was applied and the goods were held not to fall within Item No. 40.

Conclusion: Operation tables and orthopaedic and fracture tables were held not liable to excise duty under Item No. 40, while the levy on x-ray protective screens was sustained.

---