Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to interest on the sum of Rs. 45 lakhs paid under an interim order of the writ court, and, if so, at what rate.
Analysis: The concession under the Government notifications issued in relation to the sales tax exemption was treated as an exemption traceable to section 8A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The amount of Rs. 45 lakhs was paid only because of an interim arrangement in the writ proceedings, and the petitioner was ultimately found not liable to the demand. The court held that writ jurisdiction is equitable in nature and that a party deprived of the beneficial use of its money, while the State has had the use of it, may be compensated by interest. The absence of an express condition in the interim order did not bar the court from granting appropriate final relief. On the facts, the retention of the amount by the State warranted compensation, and the rate had to be fixed having regard to the circumstances and comparable precedents.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to interest on the sum of Rs. 45 lakhs from the respective dates of payment until refund, and interest was directed at 10% per annum.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, the demand was not sustained, and the petitioner obtained monetary restitution by way of compensatory interest on the amount earlier paid under the interim order.
Ratio Decidendi: A writ court exercising equitable jurisdiction may award compensatory interest on money paid under an interim order when the payer is ultimately found not liable and the State has had the benefit of the amount.