Tribunal partially overturns Revenue's rental income determination, deems reliance on valuer's report unjustified.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the Revenue's determination of rental income and restoring the income returned by the assessee. The Tribunal deemed the Revenue's reliance on the valuer's report without considering municipal valuation or standard rent as unjustified. The issue regarding the denial of statutory deduction was found irrelevant, and the claim of unfair assessment proceedings was dismissed. The order was pronounced on 12th October 2021.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Determination of income assessable under "income from house property."
2. Validity of the reference made to a valuer for determining fair market rent.
3. Rejection of comparable rent instances provided by the assessee.
4. Denial of statutory deduction under Section 24 of the Income Tax Act.
5. Alleged unfair assessment proceedings by the JCIT.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Determination of Income Assessable Under "Income from House Property":
The primary issue in the appeal was the determination of income assessable under the head "income from house property." The assessee declared rental income based on actual rent received, while the Revenue assessed it based on the fair market rent determined by a government-approved valuer. The property in question was rented out for Rs. 6,50,000, with a declared income of Rs. 4,09,830 after expenses. The AO, however, assessed the fair market rent at Rs. 3,00,000 per month, resulting in an income of Rs. 14,87,604.

2. Validity of Reference to a Valuer for Determining Fair Market Rent:
The assessee contended that there was no legal provision allowing the AO to refer the valuation of the Annual Letting Value (ALV) of the property to a valuer. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's action, stating that the AO is vested with the power to determine the ALV under Section 23(1)(a) of the Act, which involves determining the fair/reasonable rent expected to be fetched by the property. The CIT(A) further noted that municipal value or standard rent is a guiding factor but not binding on the AO. The AO can determine the fair rent by inflating or deflating the municipal value or standard rent if it is not based on relevant material.

3. Rejection of Comparable Rent Instances Provided by the Assessee:
The assessee provided instances of comparable rents for similar properties, which were rejected by the AO. The CIT(A) supported the AO's reliance on the valuer's report, stating that the assessee failed to point out specific defects in the report with supporting evidence. The Tribunal found that the Revenue's determination of the ALV based solely on the valuer's report, without considering municipal valuation or standard rent, was arbitrary and unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the Revenue's determination of Rs. 14,87,604 and restored the income returned by the assessee.

4. Denial of Statutory Deduction Under Section 24:
The assessee's ground regarding the denial of statutory deduction of 30% under Section 24 was found irrelevant by the Tribunal since the rental income assessed by the Revenue was set aside.

5. Alleged Unfair Assessment Proceedings by the JCIT:
The assessee alleged that the JCIT did not conduct the assessment proceedings fairly and disposed of the application under Section 144A without granting an opportunity of being heard. No arguments were made before the Tribunal on this ground, and it was dismissed.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, setting aside the Revenue's determination of the rental income and restoring the income returned by the assessee. The Tribunal found the Revenue's reliance on the valuer's report without considering municipal valuation or standard rent as unjustified. The ground relating to the denial of statutory deduction was found irrelevant, and the ground regarding unfair assessment proceedings was dismissed. The appeal was partly allowed, and the order was pronounced on 12th October 2021.

---