Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (11) TMI 370 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Allows Appeals on Provident Fund & ESIC Contributions Disallowances, Emphasizes Precedents & Timely Deposits The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting disallowances for delayed deposits of Provident Fund and Employees' State Insurance contributions. It held that ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Allows Appeals on Provident Fund & ESIC Contributions Disallowances, Emphasizes Precedents & Timely Deposits

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting disallowances for delayed deposits of Provident Fund and Employees' State Insurance contributions. It held that contributions made before the return filing date are allowable. The retrospective application of Explanation 2 to Section 36(1)(va) was deemed incorrect, following precedents. The Tribunal emphasized proper examination of facts and legal principles, granting consequential relief and legal claims. Disallowances were unjustified as deposits were timely. The judgment underscored adherence to precedents and prospective application of legal provisions.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Adjustment under Section 143(1) for delayed deposit of employer's contribution to Provident Fund (PF) and Employees' State Insurance (ESI).
                          2. Application of Explanation 2 under Section 36(1)(va) retrospectively.
                          3. Examination of facts, pleadings, and principles of law.
                          4. Mistake in the tax audit report by the Chartered Accountant.
                          5. Grant of consequential relief and legal claims.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Adjustment under Section 143(1) for delayed deposit of employer's contribution to Provident Fund (PF) and Employees' State Insurance (ESI):
                          The primary issue in these appeals was the adjustment under Section 143(1) amounting to Rs. 3,80,079 for delayed deposit of employer's contribution to PF and ESI. The assessees argued that the deposits were made before the due date of filing the return of income under Section 139(1) and thus should not be disallowed. The ITAT noted that an identical issue had been adjudicated in various cases, including the ITAT Jodhpur Bench in the case of M/s Ridhi Sidhi Mills (India) Pvt Ltd. vs. DCIT, where it was held that contributions made before the due date of filing the return are allowable.

                          2. Application of Explanation 2 under Section 36(1)(va) retrospectively:
                          The assessees contended that Explanation 2 to Section 36(1)(va), inserted by the Finance Act, 2021, was wrongly applied retrospectively to the assessment year 2017-18. The Tribunal referred to the decision in Harendra Nath Biswas vs. DCIT, where it was held that Explanation 2 is applicable prospectively from 01.04.2021 and not retrospectively. The Tribunal followed this reasoning, concluding that the retrospective application of the amendment was incorrect.

                          3. Examination of facts, pleadings, and principles of law:
                          The assessees argued that the authorities below did not examine the facts, pleadings, and principles of law in accordance with legal obligations. The Tribunal reviewed the material on record and found that the authorities had not properly considered the facts and legal principles, which led to an inapposite conclusion.

                          4. Mistake in the tax audit report by the Chartered Accountant:
                          The assessees claimed that the disallowance was due to a mistake in the tax audit report by the Chartered Accountant and that they should not be penalized for this error. The Tribunal noted the argument but focused on the substantive issue of whether the deposits were made before the due date of filing the return, which they were, and thus the disallowance was not justified.

                          5. Grant of consequential relief and legal claims:
                          The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, granting consequential relief by deleting the disallowances made on account of delayed deposits of PF and ESI contributions. The Tribunal emphasized that the deposits were made before the due date of filing the return under Section 139(1), and thus, the disallowances were not sustainable.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal concluded that the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by the CIT(A) were not justified since the contributions were deposited before the due date of filing the return. The appeals were allowed, and the disallowances were deleted. The judgment emphasized the prospective application of Explanation 2 to Section 36(1)(va) and followed the precedents set by various ITAT Benches and High Courts.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found