Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the criminal original petition seeking quashing of the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 could be entertained under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 when the parties raised disputed questions regarding the capacity in which the cheque was issued and the underlying employment dispute.
Analysis: The complaint contained allegations that a cheque was issued towards salary arrears and was dishonoured for insufficiency of funds, while the petitioner disputed issuance and liability and relied on the employment arrangement and arbitration clause. The controversy turned on disputed facts, including whether the cheque was issued in a personal capacity or in the capacity of the company's officer. Such questions require appreciation of evidence and determination at trial, not in proceedings invoking inherent jurisdiction for quashing. The arbitration clause did not justify interference with the criminal complaint at this stage.
Conclusion: The petition for quashing was not maintainable on the facts presented and the complaint was left to be tried in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The criminal proceedings were allowed to continue, and the challenge seeking their termination at the threshold failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Court will not undertake a factual enquiry into disputed issues that require evidence and trial, particularly where the complaint discloses the ingredients of the alleged offence.