TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court, while exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was justified in quashing the criminal complaint at the threshold by assessing the sufficiency of evidence and the proof of the alleged second marriage.
Analysis: The complaint contained specific averments that the second respondent married the first respondent during the subsistence of the appellant's marriage and that a religious ceremony was performed later; it also referred to threats and related conduct attracting the other alleged offences. The appellant had also produced a Gazette notification in which the first respondent described herself as the wife of the second respondent. At the stage of quashing, the court is required to see only whether the allegations, if accepted as true, disclose the ingredients of the offences and whether the complaint can proceed, and it cannot undertake an enquiry into the truth or evidentiary sufficiency of the allegations.
Conclusion: The High Court erred in pre-judging the matter on the basis of evidentiary insufficiency and in quashing the complaint at the threshold. The complaint disclosed allegations requiring trial, and the order of quashing was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The complaint was restored for trial and the trial court was directed to decide the matter independently on its own merits, uninfluenced by the observations of the High Court or the Supreme Court.
Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the court cannot test the truth or sufficiency of evidence at the stage of quashing and must confine itself to whether the complaint, on its face, discloses the essential ingredients of the alleged offences.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
