Correction Application Granted for Bail under Section 132 of CGST Act The Correction Application was allowed to rectify an error in the order dated 7.10.2021 related to a bail application under Section 132 of the CGST Act. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Correction Application Granted for Bail under Section 132 of CGST Act
The Correction Application was allowed to rectify an error in the order dated 7.10.2021 related to a bail application under Section 132 of the CGST Act. The applicant, asserting innocence and false implication, was granted bail due to factors such as severity of punishment, nature of accusation, and lack of criminal history. The order emphasized that the decision was solely for bail and did not reflect on the case's merits. The applicant was required to comply with certain conditions for bail, with observations confined to the bail application's disposal.
Issues: Correction in the order dated 7.10.2021, Bail application under Section 132 CGST Act
In the judgment delivered by Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi, the Correction Application No. 6 of 2021 was allowed for rectifying an error in the order dated 7.10.2021. The application sought correction due to inadvertence in the transcription of the wrong order. The corrected order pertained to a bail application filed by the applicant under Section 132 (1) (b), 132 (1) (i) of the CGST Act before the Department of D.G.G.I., Meerut, District Meerut during the trial's pendency. The applicant, represented by learned counsel, contended innocence and false implication in the case. The charge sheet had been filed, and the investigation completed. The applicant, having no criminal history, was on interim bail during the Covid-19 pandemic. The applicant's release on bail was granted considering the severity of punishment, nature of accusation, supporting evidence, and the reformative theory of punishment, without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. The conditions for bail included furnishing a personal bond and sureties, compliance with court appearances, surrendering passport if applicable, and not influencing witnesses or disputing identity as the accused. The order emphasized that observations were confined to the bail application's disposal and did not reflect on the case's ultimate merits. It directed the filing of a computer-generated copy of the order from the High Court Allahabad's official website, attested by the party's counsel, with verification by the concerned Court/Authority/Official from the official website.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
