Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (10) TMI 95 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Rules in Favor of Taxpayer: No Service Tax on Railways Services & Bricks Sale The Tribunal held that no service tax is payable on the amount of Rs. 5,22,651/- for services provided to Railways in 2015-16. Additionally, no service ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Rules in Favor of Taxpayer: No Service Tax on Railways Services & Bricks Sale

                          The Tribunal held that no service tax is payable on the amount of Rs. 5,22,651/- for services provided to Railways in 2015-16. Additionally, no service tax is chargeable on the sale of bricks. Abatement must be allowed on works contract services, and no service tax is applicable to laying underground cables for BSNL. The appellant is entitled to credit for all taxes paid through challans, with a refund of any excess payment and interest. The Adjudicating Authority is directed to recompute the tax liability accordingly. Penalties under Section 76 are set aside, and penalties under Section 77(2) and Rule 7C are reduced. The appeal is allowed, and the appellant is entitled to consequential benefits.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Exemption on services provided to Railways.
                          2. Treatment of receipts from the sale of bricks.
                          3. Abatement on works contract services.
                          4. Exemption for laying underground cables for BSNL.
                          5. Credit for service tax paid through challans.
                          6. Invocation of the extended period for demand.
                          7. Imposition of penalties under Sections 76, 77(2), and Rule 7C of the Service Tax Rules.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Exemption on Services Provided to Railways:
                          The appellant contended that the services provided to Railways were exempt under Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012. The Commissioner allowed exemption for amounts reflected in Form 26AS but not for the total amounts received as per the profit and loss account. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner erred in not allowing exemption on the full amount of Rs. 5,22,651/- for the year 2015-16 as recorded in the profit and loss account. Hence, no service tax is chargeable on this amount.

                          2. Treatment of Receipts from the Sale of Bricks:
                          The Commissioner treated the receipts from the sale of bricks as taxable services due to the lack of documentation and cash transactions exceeding Rs. 20,000/-, which was not allowable under Section 40A(3A) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the provisions of the Income Tax Act are not relevant for service tax determination and that there is no presumption available to the Adjudicating Authority to reject sales turnover. Thus, the demand for service tax on the sale of bricks was set aside.

                          3. Abatement on Works Contract Services:
                          The Commissioner disallowed abatement on works contract services due to the non-filing of ST-3 returns, making it unverifiable whether CENVAT credit was availed. The Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to abatement as the use of materials was admitted, and the assumption of availing CENVAT credit without evidence is not permissible. Therefore, the tax liability must be determined after allowing abatement at the prescribed rate.

                          4. Exemption for Laying Underground Cables for BSNL:
                          The appellant argued that the activity of laying underground cables for BSNL is exempt as per Circular No. 123/5/2010-TRU dated 24.05.2010. The Tribunal agreed, referencing a similar case (Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise), and set aside the demand for service tax on this activity.

                          5. Credit for Service Tax Paid Through Challans:
                          The appellant claimed a refund of Rs. 71,97,979/- deposited during the investigation. The Commissioner denied adjustment due to the absence of ST-3 returns. The Tribunal directed the Revenue to reconcile the challans with the appellant's assistance and give credit for all taxes paid, with a refund of any excess payment along with interest at 12% p.a. from the date of deposit.

                          6. Invocation of the Extended Period for Demand:
                          The appellant challenged the invocation of the extended period for demand. The Tribunal upheld the invocation due to the appellant's admitted failure to file returns for the period October 2015 to March 2017.

                          7. Imposition of Penalties:
                          The Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 76 and reduced the penalties under Section 77(2) to Rs. 5,000/- per return (Rs. 15,000/- in total) and under Section 70 read with Rule 7C to Rs. 5,000/-.

                          Summary of Judgment:
                          - No service tax is payable on Rs. 5,22,651/- for work done for Railways in 2015-16.
                          - No service tax is chargeable on the sale of bricks.
                          - Abatement must be allowed on works contract services.
                          - No service tax is chargeable on laying underground cables for BSNL.
                          - Credit for all taxes paid through challans must be given, with a refund of any excess payment with interest.
                          - The Adjudicating Authority is directed to recompute the tax liability based on this order.
                          - Penalty under Section 76 is set aside; penalties under Section 77(2) and Rule 7C are reduced.

                          The appeal is allowed, and the impugned order is modified. The appellant is entitled to consequential benefits.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found