Revenue appeals dismissed, Forex losses allowed as business losses, loan waiver not taxable. Cross objections partly allowed.

The appeals of the revenue were dismissed, and the delays in filing were condoned. The disallowance of Forex derivative losses was overturned, allowing them as business losses. The waiver of the loan under OTS was deemed a capital receipt and not taxable. Cross objections for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2012-13 were dismissed, while those for A.Y. 2013-14 were partly allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Condonation of Delay.
2. Disallowance of Forex Derivative Losses.
3. Waiver of Loan by One Time Settlement (OTS).

Detailed Analysis:

Condonation of Delay:
The Department filed appeals with delays of 186 days, 111 days, and 111 days for different assessment years, citing administrative reasons. The assessee also filed cross objections with a delay of 26 days due to health reasons. After hearing both parties, the delays were condoned, and the appeals were admitted for hearing.

Disallowance of Forex Derivative Losses:
The assessee, engaged in trading, manufacturing, and exporting agricultural products, claimed a loss of Rs. 45,69,33,047/- on forward contracts as revenue expenditure under 'administrative expenses'. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed this claim, treating the loss as notional and contingent, arguing that the contracts were entered into without actual export obligations and in violation of RBI norms. The AO's main points were:
- No underlying exposure to foreign exchange risks.
- Contracts entered even after a government ban on rice export.
- Amounts of derivative contracts exceeded the export of agri products.
- Losses were unrealized and contingent, not crystallized.
- Hedging was not related to business activity.

The assessee argued that the losses were crystallized as the bank debited the loss amount to the export packing credit loan account. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] found the facts identical to a previous case (Shri Ramalingeswara Rice & Oil Mill) and deleted the addition.

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, concluding that the losses were indeed crystallized and incurred during the course of business, thus allowable as business losses. The Tribunal cited the case of Sri Ramalingeswara Rice & Oil Mill, where similar losses were considered business losses, and the High Court of Telangana dismissed the revenue's appeal against this decision.

Waiver of Loan by One Time Settlement (OTS):
For the A.Y. 2013-14, the AO found that the assessee had taken a loan which became a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) and was settled under OTS at Rs. 90 crores. The AO treated the waiver of Rs. 26,03,66,197/- as a revenue receipt and added it to the income. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition.

The assessee argued that the waiver of the principal amount is a capital receipt, not taxable under sections 28(iv) or 41(1) of the Act. The Tribunal agreed, citing the case of Vasavi Polymers, where it was held that the principal amount waived under OTS is not taxable as it was never claimed as an expenditure. The Tribunal also referred to the Supreme Court's decision in CIT Vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., which held that the waiver of a loan does not amount to cessation of trading liability and is not taxable under section 41(1).

The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and deleted the addition, holding that the waiver of the principal amount is a capital receipt and not taxable.

Cross Objections:
For the A.Y. 2009-10 and 2012-13, the cross objections filed by the assessee became infructuous as the revenue's appeals were dismissed. For the A.Y. 2013-14, the cross objections were partly allowed, with some grounds dismissed as not pressed.

Conclusion:
- The appeals of the revenue were dismissed.
- The cross objections for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2012-13 were dismissed.
- The cross objections for A.Y. 2013-14 were partly allowed.

---