Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the criminal proceeding arising out of the complaint should be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the ground that the dispute was essentially civil in nature and did not disclose the ingredients of cheating or criminal breach of trust.
Analysis: The dispute arose from a commercial transaction for supply of goods, against which part payment had been made and the balance remained unpaid. The Court noted that the materials did not show any deception or dishonest inducement at the inception of the transaction. In the absence of allegations or evidence of fraudulent or dishonest intention from the beginning, mere non-payment of the balance price could not be converted into an offence under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court also applied the settled principle that the inherent power under Section 482 of the Code may be used to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice, especially where the allegations reveal a civil dispute disguised as a criminal case.
Conclusion: The proceedings were held liable to be quashed, as the dispute was civil in character and the criminal case did not disclose the essential ingredients of the alleged offences.