Tribunal directs cooperation from suspended Directors under Insolvency Code The Tribunal allowed the applications under Section 19 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, directing the suspended Directors and managerial persons to ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal directs cooperation from suspended Directors under Insolvency Code
The Tribunal allowed the applications under Section 19 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, directing the suspended Directors and managerial persons to cooperate fully with the Resolution Professional. Failure to provide information or cooperate could lead to liability under Section 70 of the Code. The Resolution Professional was instructed to take possession of all relevant records to facilitate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process efficiently. The judgment emphasized timely cooperation and information provision to ensure the completion of the process within the required time frame, highlighting the importance of compliance with the Tribunal's directions for successful resolution.
Issues: Application under Section 19(2) & Section 60(5) read with rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 for directions to Suspended Directors and Statutory Auditors to provide assistance, co-operation, and information to Resolution Professional.
Detailed Analysis:
1. The Tribunal initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional, later confirmed as Resolution Professional.
2. The Resolution Professional requested documents from Suspended Directors and Statutory Auditors multiple times but received no response, hindering the valuation process.
3. Despite efforts by the Resolution Professional, including convening meetings and requesting information, non-cooperation from the Suspended Directors and Statutory Auditors delayed the CIR Process.
4. The Resolution Professional was provided with some documents by the ex-management, but they did not meet the requirements for an effective CIR Process.
5. Notices were issued to the respondents, but they did not appear or respond, leading to an ex parte hearing and subsequent reserved order.
6. The Tribunal referred to Section 19 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, emphasizing the obligation of Corporate Debtor personnel to assist the Resolution Professional.
7. Considering the facts of the case, the Tribunal directed the suspended Directors and managerial persons to cooperate fully and provide all necessary information to complete the CIRP efficiently.
8. The Tribunal held that failure to provide information or cooperate could lead to liability under Section 70 of the Code.
9. The applications were allowed, and the Tribunal directed the suspended Directors and managerial persons to extend full cooperation to the Resolution Professional.
10. The Resolution Professional was further directed to take possession of all relevant records to facilitate the CIRP process effectively and efficiently.
11. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely cooperation and information provision to ensure the completion of the CIRP within the required time frame.
12. The judgment concluded by allowing the applications and disposing of the matter, highlighting the importance of compliance with the directions given by the Tribunal for the successful resolution of the Corporate Insolvency process.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
