Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (8) TMI 894 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Overturns Tax Assessments, Deems Advances as Commercial Transactions The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, concluding that the assessment framed under section 143(3) read with section 153A was invalid due to ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Overturns Tax Assessments, Deems Advances as Commercial Transactions

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, concluding that the assessment framed under section 143(3) read with section 153A was invalid due to the absence of incriminating material. The advances made by M/s. Wind World India Ltd. to related entities were considered commercial transactions and not deemed dividends. Statements recorded under section 132(4) during the search were deemed not incriminating material. The transactions between related entities were found to be out of commercial considerations and not subject to section 2(22)(e). The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the additions made based on these findings.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Jurisdictional issue regarding the validity of the assessment framed under section 143(3) read with section 153A of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. The applicability of section 2(22)(e) regarding deemed dividend in the context of loans and advances made by M/s. Wind World India Ltd. to related entities.
                          3. The evidentiary value of statements recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act during the search.
                          4. The nature of transactions between related entities and whether they constitute commercial transactions or deemed dividends.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Jurisdictional Issue:
                          The primary issue raised by the assessee was against the order of the CIT(A) upholding the assessment framed under section 143(3) read with section 153A. The assessee contended that no incriminating material was found during the search, and thus, no addition could be made in the absence of such material since the assessment had attained finality and was unabated on the date of the search. The Tribunal referred to several judicial precedents, including the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Kabul Chawla, which summarized the legal position that completed assessments can be interfered with by the AO under section 153A only on the basis of some incriminating material unearthed during the search. The Tribunal concluded that in the absence of incriminating material, the completed assessment could not be disturbed, thus siding with the assessee on this jurisdictional issue.

                          2. Applicability of Section 2(22)(e):
                          The AO had treated the advances made by M/s. Wind World India Ltd. to related entities as deemed dividends under section 2(22)(e). The assessee argued that these advances were given out of commercial considerations and expediency, specifically for purchasing land due to land ceiling laws in various states, and thus could not be treated as deemed dividends. The Tribunal noted that these transactions were indeed out of commercial considerations and for the purpose of business, aligning with the judicial precedents that similar financial transactions between sister concerns for business purposes do not attract the provisions of section 2(22)(e). Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition made on this ground.

                          3. Evidentiary Value of Statements Recorded Under Section 132(4):
                          The Tribunal examined whether the statements recorded during the search under section 132(4) could be considered incriminating material. The assessee argued that statements recorded during the search could not be treated as incriminating material. The Tribunal agreed with this view, citing the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court's decision in Harjeev Aggarwal, which held that statements recorded during search operations do not constitute incriminating material on their own. The Tribunal concluded that the addition made on the basis of such statements was not justified.

                          4. Nature of Transactions Between Related Entities:
                          The Tribunal analyzed the nature of the transactions between M/s. Wind World India Ltd. and its related entities, determining whether these were commercial transactions or deemed dividends. The Tribunal found that the advances were made to overcome land ceiling restrictions and were necessary for the business operations of installing windmills. The Tribunal noted that these transactions were out of business and commercial considerations, supported by judicial precedents and a CBDT circular clarifying that trade advances for commercial transactions do not fall under section 2(22)(e). Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition, concluding that these transactions were not loans or advances for the purpose of invoking section 2(22)(e).

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, concluding that:
                          1. The assessment framed under section 143(3) read with section 153A was invalid in the absence of incriminating material.
                          2. The advances made by M/s. Wind World India Ltd. to related entities were commercial transactions and not deemed dividends.
                          3. Statements recorded under section 132(4) during the search do not constitute incriminating material.
                          4. The transactions between related entities were out of commercial considerations and thus not subject to section 2(22)(e).

                          The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the additions made, aligning with the judicial precedents and the nature of the transactions.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found