Refund entitlement under Notification No. 102/2007 turns on invoice-to-bill-of-entry correlation and proof of identity of goods.

Refund claims under Notification No. 102/2007 required proof that the goods sold in the domestic market were the same goods imported, with the sales invoices and supporting records correlating to the bills of entry and describing the goods consistently. Because the record showed uncertainty on that correlation and incomplete factual verification, the appellate determination could not stand. The appellant was to be given an opportunity to supply the necessary material, and the claim was remanded to the original authority for fresh adjudication of entitlement to post-import refund of special additional duty.

---

---

Issues: Whether the refund claims under Notification No. 102/2007 dated 14th September 2007 could be sustained on the material placed, and whether the matter required reconsideration by the original authority.

Analysis: The refund entitlement depended on satisfaction that the goods sold in the domestic market were the same goods that had been imported and that the documentary record, including the sales invoices and other supporting material, established compliance with the conditions for post-import refund of special additional duty. The record showed uncertainty on correlation of the invoices with the bills of entry and on the description of the goods, and the appellant was to be given an opportunity to furnish the necessary information for a proper determination. In view of that incomplete factual verification, the appellate order was set aside and the claim was sent back for fresh consideration.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh adjudication of the refund claims.

---