<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 539 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410961</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute by M/s Avivet Nutritional Services Pvt Ltd against the rejection of refund claims for special additional duty on imported goods. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed the original authority to reconsider the application, emphasizing the need for proper determination of goods sold for refund eligibility. The appellant was instructed to provide necessary information within three months for a reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:06:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 539 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410961</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute by M/s Avivet Nutritional Services Pvt Ltd against the rejection of refund claims for special additional duty on imported goods. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed the original authority to reconsider the application, emphasizing the need for proper determination of goods sold for refund eligibility. The appellant was instructed to provide necessary information within three months for a reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>