Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether anticipatory bail should be protected by interim restraint against coercive steps, subject to the applicant depositing amounts in instalments and cooperating in the investigation.
Analysis: The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court recorded the applicant's undertaking to deposit a specified portion of the alleged liability in three instalments, and to join and cooperate with the investigation whenever called upon. The undertaking was taken on record and made binding. The interim protection was linked to compliance with the undertaking and cooperation with the investigating agency, with an express stipulation that non-compliance would automatically recall the protection.
Conclusion: Interim protection against coercive steps was granted in favour of the petitioner, subject to deposit of the undertaking amounts and cooperation in the investigation.