<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 262 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410684</link>
    <description>Interim protection against coercive steps was linked to the applicant&#039;s undertaking in a CGST prosecution to deposit the stated liability in instalments and to cooperate with the investigation whenever called upon. The undertaking was taken on record and made binding, and the protection would stand recalled automatically if there was non-compliance. The operative effect was that anticipatory bail protection remained conditional on timely deposits and full investigative cooperation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 262 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410684</link>
      <description>Interim protection against coercive steps was linked to the applicant&#039;s undertaking in a CGST prosecution to deposit the stated liability in instalments and to cooperate with the investigation whenever called upon. The undertaking was taken on record and made binding, and the protection would stand recalled automatically if there was non-compliance. The operative effect was that anticipatory bail protection remained conditional on timely deposits and full investigative cooperation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>