Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Section 7 insolvency application was within limitation and whether the alleged acknowledgment of debt extended the period of limitation.
Analysis: The date of default was recorded as 07.06.2016 in the Section 7 application, and the debtor's reply also ed that the account was declared NPA on that date. The application filed on 04.06.2019 was therefore within the three-year limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. In any event, the record contained an acknowledgment of debt dated 19.11.2018 signed by two directors, and the objections to that document were not found sufficient to dislodge the finding of the Adjudicating Authority. The limitation objection was thus rejected.
Conclusion: The Section 7 application was held to be within limitation, and the admission order was sustained.