Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether regular bail should be granted in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in the face of the bail restrictions under Section 45, and whether the proviso to that section and the surrounding facts justified release on bail.
Analysis: The Court noted the competing views on the post-amendment position of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and treated the earlier striking down of the twin conditions as materially relevant to the bail enquiry. It further considered the statutory burden under Section 24 and the nature of the alleged proceeds of crime, including the distinction drawn between the amount attributed to government agencies and the amount said to arise from private transactions. The Court also took into account that documentary material had already been collected, the applicant had been in custody for a substantial period, further custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and there was no serious material suggesting flight risk, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses. The Court additionally relied on the proviso to Section 45 and the limited quantum attributed to the government-side loss.
Conclusion: Regular bail was granted to the applicant.