TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal remands case for unexplained investment assessment, stresses procedural fairness and natural justice</h1> <h3>Sri Jitender Kumar Gupta (HUF), Hyderabad Versus A.C.I.T Circle 7 (1) Hyderabad</h3> Sri Jitender Kumar Gupta (HUF), Hyderabad Versus A.C.I.T Circle 7 (1) Hyderabad - TMI Issues:Assessment of unexplained investment under section 69B, Failure to provide reasons for reopening the case under section 147, Violation of principles of natural justice.Analysis:1. Assessment of unexplained investment under section 69B:The case involved the assessee's appeal against the addition of Rs. 12,98,500 as unexplained investment under section 69B. The Assessing Officer treated the shares purchased by the assessee as penny stocks used for generating bogus LTCG/STCL and business loss. The CIT (A) confirmed the addition, leading to the appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee contended that the source of investment was explained, and the Assessing Officer's decision was not justified. The Tribunal, citing a similar case, remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer, directing to provide reasons for reopening and afford the assessee a fair opportunity of hearing.2. Failure to provide reasons for reopening the case under section 147:The Tribunal highlighted the importance of providing reasons for reopening a case under section 147. Citing the decision in another case, it emphasized that the Assessing Officer must supply reasons for reopening and address any objections raised by the assessee before proceeding with reassessment. In this case, the Assessing Officer failed to follow due procedure, leading to the Tribunal's decision to remand the issue for proper compliance with the law.3. Violation of principles of natural justice:The assessee raised a ground alleging a violation of natural justice due to the lack of opportunity for a fair hearing. The Tribunal acknowledged this concern and remitted the case to the Assessing Officer with directions to provide reasons for reopening and ensure the assessee's objections are duly considered before proceeding with the reassessment. This decision aimed to uphold the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness in the assessment process.In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment addressed the issues of unexplained investment assessment under section 69B, the necessity of providing reasons for reopening cases under section 147, and the importance of upholding natural justice principles in tax assessments. The decision emphasized the procedural requirements and the assessee's right to a fair hearing, ensuring compliance with the law and safeguarding the taxpayer's interests.
TaxTMI 