Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether liquidation of the corporate debtor should be ordered under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 when the corporate insolvency resolution process period had expired and no resolution plan had been approved.
Analysis: The application was filed by the resolution professional seeking liquidation after expiry of the CIRP period. The record showed that no resolution plan had been received within the statutory period, and the request for extension did not secure the requisite approval of the committee of creditors. In these circumstances, the case satisfied the statutory basis for initiation of liquidation under the Code. Consequential directions were issued for appointment of the liquidator, cessation of the earlier moratorium, commencement of the fresh moratorium under liquidation, and conduct of liquidation proceedings in accordance with the Code and the applicable regulations.
Conclusion: Liquidation was ordered and the application for liquidation was allowed.