Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (5) TMI 934 - NAPA - GST

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Failure to Pass GST Benefit Results in Profiteering Violation Recalculation The Authority directed the DGAP to recompute the amount of profiteering. The Respondent failed to pass on the benefit of the reduced GST rate to ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Failure to Pass GST Benefit Results in Profiteering Violation Recalculation

                              The Authority directed the DGAP to recompute the amount of profiteering. The Respondent failed to pass on the benefit of the reduced GST rate to recipients by keeping ticket prices unchanged through increasing base prices, violating Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The profiteered amount was recalculated to Rs. 1,29,243/- for the period from 1-1-2019 to 30-6-2019, excluding the period from 11-3-2019 to 8-5-2019 when the base prices were reduced in line with the tax rate reduction.




                              Issues Involved:

                              1. Whether the GST rate on "Services by way of admission to the exhibition of cinematograph films where the price of admission ticket was less than one hundred rupees" was reduced from 18% to 12% w.e.f. 1-1-2019.
                              2. Whether the benefit of such reduction in the rate of GST had been passed on by the Respondent to his recipients, in terms of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.
                              3. Whether the Respondent increased the base prices of the tickets, thereby nullifying the impact of the tax rate reduction.
                              4. Whether the Respondent's arguments and evidence provided were adequate to refute the allegations of profiteering.
                              5. Whether the recomputation of the profiteered amount should be limited to a specific period.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              Issue 1: Reduction in GST Rate

                              The DGAP confirmed that the Central Government, on the recommendation of the GST Council, reduced the GST rate on "Services by way of admission to the exhibition of cinematograph films where the price of admission ticket was less than one hundred rupees" from 18% to 12% w.e.f. 1-1-2019, as per Notification No. 27/2018-Central Tax (Rate), dated 31-12-2018. This fact was not contested by the Respondent.

                              Issue 2: Passing on the Benefit of GST Rate Reduction

                              The investigation revealed that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of the GST rate reduction to the recipients. Despite the reduction in GST, the Respondent kept the final price of the movie tickets unchanged by increasing the base prices of the tickets. This contravened Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, which mandates that any reduction in the tax rate must result in a commensurate reduction in prices.

                              Issue 3: Increase in Base Prices

                              The DGAP's investigation found that the Respondent increased the base prices of the admission tickets for First Class and Second Class categories when the GST rate was reduced from 18% to 12%. The base prices increased from Rs. 67.80 to Rs. 71.43 for First Class tickets and from Rs. 42.37 to Rs. 44.65 for Second Class tickets, thereby nullifying the impact of the tax rate reduction.

                              Issue 4: Respondent's Arguments and Evidence

                              The Respondent argued that:

                              - The reduced rate of tax was charged from the customers.
                              - No benefit of ITC was accrued due to the nature of the service.
                              - The ticket prices were changed based on various factors like the age of the movie and performance.
                              - The difference amount accrued to the producer/distributor, not to the Respondent.

                              However, the DGAP found these arguments unsubstantiated. The investigation showed that the prices of the tickets remained more or less uniform post-tax rate reduction and were not dynamically changed as claimed by the Respondent. No documentary evidence was provided to support the Respondent's claims about the influence of producers/distributors on ticket pricing.

                              Issue 5: Recomputing the Profiteered Amount

                              The DGAP acknowledged that the Respondent reduced the base prices of First Class and Second Class tickets during the period from 11-3-2019 to 8-5-2019. Therefore, this period was excluded from the calculation of the profiteered amount. The total profiteered amount was recomputed to Rs. 1,29,243/- for the period from 1-1-2019 to 30-6-2019, excluding the period from 11-3-2019 to 8-5-2019.

                              Conclusion:

                              The Authority directed the DGAP to recompute the amount of profiteering in line with the observations made. The Respondent was found to have contravened the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, by not passing on the benefit of the reduction in the GST rate to the recipients. The recomputation of the profiteered amount should exclude the period from 11-3-2019 to 8-5-2019, during which the Respondent had reduced the base prices of the tickets commensurately.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found