Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to the benefit of Exemption Notification No. 154/70 despite alleged non-compliance with certain procedural requirements under Chapter X.
Analysis: The application of Chapter X procedure was found to have been followed in substance. The classification list dated 3-6-1974 was not controverted, and the authorities did not dispute that the goods were used for the purpose relevant to the exemption. The absence of certain formalities, including the complained-of procedural defects, was treated as insufficient to deny the substantive benefit of the notification where the essential requirements were otherwise satisfied.
Conclusion: The petitioners were held entitled to the exemption and the procedural objections did not defeat the claim.