Operational Debt Default Triggers Insolvency Resolution Process

The Tribunal admitted the Corporate Debtor into insolvency resolution process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code due to default in operational debt payment. The Corporate Debtor admitted the debt but failed to make payments, leading to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to oversee the resolution process. A moratorium was declared, prohibiting actions against the Corporate Debtor. The Operational Creditor was directed to pay an advance for the resolution process, emphasizing cooperation among all parties involved. Procedural directives were issued for the smooth conduct of the resolution process.

---

---

Issues: Application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process due to default in operational debt payment.

Analysis:
1. Operational Debt Default: The application was filed against the Corporate Debtor for defaulting on the payment of operational debt amounting to Rs. 20,15,647. The Operational Creditor had sold and supplied goods to the Corporate Debtor, who failed to make the payment as agreed, leading to the initiation of the insolvency resolution process.

2. Admission of Debt: The Corporate Debtor admitted the existence of the debt and default due to financial constraints exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite not disputing the operational debt of over Rs. 17,62,920, the Corporate Debtor did not make any payment even after receiving a demand notice, prompting the Tribunal to admit the Corporate Debtor into the insolvency resolution process.

3. Adjudication and Moratorium: The Tribunal declared a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, prohibiting various actions against the Corporate Debtor, including institution of suits, transferring assets, enforcing security interests, and property recovery. The moratorium would be in effect until the completion of the resolution process or approval of a resolution plan.

4. Appointment of IRP: Mr. Jaykumar Pesumal Arlani was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to oversee the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The IRP is tasked with conducting the resolution process as per the provisions of the Code and regulations, with the obligation to protect and preserve the Corporate Debtor's assets and manage its operations.

5. Operational Creditor's Obligations: The Operational Creditor was directed to pay an advance of Rs. 50,000 to the IRP for the smooth conduct of the resolution process. Additionally, the IRP was authorized to request further interim funds as per rules, emphasizing the importance of cooperation from all parties involved in the process.

6. Procedural Directives: The Tribunal directed the IRP to make a public announcement of the initiation of the resolution process, call for submission of claims, and ensure the continuity of goods/services supply to the Corporate Debtor during the moratorium period. The Registry was instructed to communicate the order to relevant parties and upload it on the website promptly.

This detailed analysis outlines the key aspects of the judgment, including the debt default, admission by the Corporate Debtor, moratorium declaration, appointment of the IRP, operational creditor's obligations, and procedural directives for the resolution process.

---