Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (4) TMI 1140 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court affirms Tribunal decision on subscription charges not as income. Revenue appeals dismissed. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming that the subscription charges collected by the assessee were not its income but were collected on ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          High Court affirms Tribunal decision on subscription charges not as income. Revenue appeals dismissed.

                          The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming that the subscription charges collected by the assessee were not its income but were collected on behalf of Sun TV Network Limited. The court found no error in the Tribunal's order and dismissed the Revenue's appeals, stating that the orders of the Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were just and proper. The court concluded that there was no substantial question of law to interfere with the Tribunal's orders, thereby affirming the assessee's eligibility for TDS credit.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Eligibility for TDS credit without offering corresponding income for tax.
                          2. Applicability of Section 199 of the Income Tax Act and Rule 37BA of the Income Tax Rules.
                          3. Interpretation of agreements and the nature of income in relation to TDS claims.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Eligibility for TDS Credit Without Offering Corresponding Income for Tax:
                          The central issue in these appeals is whether the assessee is eligible for TDS credit without offering the corresponding income for tax. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the assessee's claim for TDS credit on the grounds that the subscription charges were not offered for tax in the return of income. However, the assessee contended that it acted merely as a collection agent for M/s. Sun TV Network Limited, and the subscription income was accounted for in the hands of Sun TV, not the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's claim, stating that the subscription charges collected were not the income of the assessee but were remitted to Sun TV Network Limited.

                          2. Applicability of Section 199 of the Income Tax Act and Rule 37BA of the Income Tax Rules:
                          The Revenue argued that the Tribunal erred in not considering Section 199 and Rule 37BA, which stipulate that TDS credit can only be given if the corresponding income is offered for tax. The appellant relied on several judgments to support this contention, including:
                          - Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Tanjore Permanent Bank Ltd.: Emphasized that tax credit should only be given if the related income is offered for assessment.
                          - Naresh Bhavani Shah (HUF) Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax: Highlighted that TDS credit should be given to the rightful person as per the PAN and the TDS certificate.
                          - Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt. Pushpa Vijoy: Clarified that credit for TDS should be given only in the assessment year in which the income is assessed.
                          - ICRCL-KBL (JV) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Stated that the Revenue cannot retain TDS amounts without credit being given to anyone.

                          The Tribunal, however, noted that the amended Rule 37BA(2)(i) came into effect only on 01.11.2011, and thus, it was not applicable to the assessment years in question (2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12).

                          3. Interpretation of Agreements and the Nature of Income in Relation to TDS Claims:
                          The assessee's agreement with Sun TV Network Limited, dated 14.10.2002, established that the assessee was entitled to a fixed commission for collecting subscription charges on behalf of Sun TV. The Tribunal found that the amounts collected were credited to a "Subscription Charges" account and debited when paid to Sun TV, indicating that these amounts were not the assessee's income. Consequently, the Tribunal held that denying TDS credit would result in double taxation, as the income was already taxed in the hands of Sun TV Network Limited.

                          Conclusion:
                          The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming that the subscription charges collected by the assessee were not its income but were collected on behalf of Sun TV Network Limited. The court found no error in the Tribunal's order and dismissed the Revenue's appeals, stating that the orders of the Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were just and proper. The court concluded that there was no substantial question of law to interfere with the Tribunal's orders, thereby affirming the assessee's eligibility for TDS credit.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found