Tribunal Partly Allows Appeal; Remands Disallowance for Verification; Recognizes Compensatory Interest & No Exempt Income.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. The addition under Section 36(1)(va) was upheld, dismissing the related ground. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was remanded to the A.O. for verification, allowing it for statistical purposes. The disallowance of interest on late TDS payment under Section 37 was allowed, recognizing the interest as compensatory. The disallowance under Section 14A was also allowed, as no exempt income was identified. The decision was pronounced on 09-10-2020 under Rule 34 of the ITAT Rules, 1963.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Addition under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Disallowance of interest paid on late payment of TDS under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
4. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Addition under Section 36(1)(va):
The assessee contested the addition of Rs. 3,11,536/- made by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) under Section 36(1)(va) for delayed payments of employees' contribution to Provident Fund (PF) and Employee State Insurance (ESI). The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation, which held that Section 43B is not applicable for delayed payments of employees' contributions as per Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x). Given this precedent, the Tribunal upheld the addition made by the A.O. and dismissed this ground of appeal.

2. Addition under Section 40(a)(ia):
The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 90,637/- being interest paid to Kotak Mahindra Pvt. Ltd. under Section 40(a)(ia). The assessee's representative argued that the recipient had already paid tax on the interest, and thus, the matter should be verified by the A.O. The Tribunal agreed with this submission and restored the issue to the A.O. for verification. If the recipient had indeed paid tax on the interest, no disallowance should be made against the assessee. This ground was allowed for statistical purposes.

3. Disallowance of Interest on Late Payment of TDS under Section 37:
The assessee argued that the interest paid on late payment of TDS was compensatory and not penal, and thus should be allowed as a deduction under Section 37. The Tribunal referred to the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in Prakash Cotton Mills, which mandates examining whether statutory imposts are compensatory or penal. The Tribunal concluded that the interest on TDS was compensatory and directed the A.O. to allow the deduction. This ground was allowed.

4. Disallowance under Section 14A:
The assessee contended that no exempt income was earned during the relevant assessment year, and therefore, no disallowance should be made under Section 14A. The Tribunal referred to the Hon'ble Delhi High Court's decision in Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT, which held that Section 14A does not apply if no exempt income is received or receivable during the relevant year. Since the A.O. had not identified any exempt income earned by the assessee, the Tribunal ruled that the disallowance under Section 14A was unjustified. This ground was allowed.

Conclusion:
The appeal was partly allowed. Ground No. 1 was dismissed, Ground No. 2 was allowed for statistical purposes, and Grounds No. 3 and 4 were allowed. The order was pronounced on 09-10-2020 as per Rule 34 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal Rules -1963).

---