Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal should rectify apparent mistakes in its earlier order by substituting references to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and learned CIT(A) with Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) and learned CIT(E).
Analysis: The Miscellaneous Application was moved under Section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for correction of drafting mistakes in the earlier appellate order. On perusal of the record, the Tribunal found that the wrong designation had been used in several paragraphs. The errors were held to be mistakes apparent from the record and were corrected accordingly.
Conclusion: The rectification was allowed and the earlier order was amended to substitute the correct designation of the authority.