https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406641 A Miscellaneous Application under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 sought correction of drafting errors in an earlier ITAT order where references to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and learned CIT(A) had been used instead of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) and learned CIT(E). The Tribunal held that the designation was a mistake apparent from the record and corrected the order by substituting the proper authority designation. en-us Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:53:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406641 A Miscellaneous Application under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 sought correction of drafting errors in an earlier ITAT order where references to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and learned CIT(A) had been used instead of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) and learned CIT(E). The Tribunal held that the designation was a mistake apparent from the record and corrected the order by substituting the proper authority designation. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406641