https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406641 The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee's Miscellaneous Application for rectification of typographical errors in the Tribunal's order in an Income Tax Appeal. The errors involved incorrect references to "Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)" and "learned CIT(A)" instead of the correct terms. The Tribunal rectified the mistakes as requested, emphasizing the importance of ensuring accuracy in legal documents. This decision underscores the necessity of addressing errors promptly to maintain precision and clarity in legal terminology, ultimately upholding the integrity of the judicial system. en-us Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:53:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406641 The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee's Miscellaneous Application for rectification of typographical errors in the Tribunal's order in an Income Tax Appeal. The errors involved incorrect references to "Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)" and "learned CIT(A)" instead of the correct terms. The Tribunal rectified the mistakes as requested, emphasizing the importance of ensuring accuracy in legal documents. This decision underscores the necessity of addressing errors promptly to maintain precision and clarity in legal terminology, ultimately upholding the integrity of the judicial system. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406641